What Do Limp Wrists Have To Do With Gay Men

May 17th, 2012 by admin

Self-portrait by Anthony Van Dyck.

Hermitage Museum via Wikimedia Commons.

After encouraging fathers to “punch” sons who exhibit stereotypically gay behavior, North Carolina pastor Sean Harris said on Tuesday that he should have chosen different words. In his April 28 sermon, Harris said, “Dads Cheap windows 7 key, the second you see your son dropping the limp wrist, you walk over there and crack that wrist.” Why do we associate a limp wrist with male homosexuality?

It probably goes back to ancient Rome. Ancient rhetoric teachers discouraged limp-wristedness during public speaking. This had nothing to do with homosexuality—the Romans didn’t consider gay sex, per se, unmanly. A limp wrist was thought to betray a more general lack of masculine control over the body and its various urges. In the 18th century, however, Europeans came to think of homosexuality as a character trait rather than an occasional behavior, and gay sex became the antithesis of manliness. Physiognomists, who believed that physical appearance and mannerisms were evidence of one’s character, appear to have picked up on the ancient Roman belief that real men had rock-solid wrists. During this time Office 2010 Key, limp wrists came to signify not just ill discipline, but various other supposed failures of manhood, such as homosexuality Buy windows 7 key, exhibitionism, and foppery.

There are other theories as well. Some writers propose a sartorial explanation: 17th and 18th century women used to wear tight sleeves that restricted their elbows and shoulders, leaving only their wrists to gesture. Men with floppy wrists, therefore, appeared effeminate. Others point to European court portraiture of the 16th and 17th centuries, which often portrayed important men with delicate, limp wrists. (See this depiction of England’s King James I or this self-portrait by painter Anthony Van Dyck while working for the House of Stuart.) As the ornamentation and leisure of courtly life fell out of favor with men, a limp wrist—often with the other hand placed on the hip in an “I’m a Little Teapot” pose—came to symbolize the unmanly homosexual stereotype. These explanations aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive; they might all have contributed to the development of the stereotype.

Advertisement

Whatever its origins, the association of limp wrists with male homosexuality was very well-established in the United States by the beginning of the 20th century. A pair of postcards from around 1910 show limp-wristed men saying things like, “Sweet perfume of Violets! What a charming policeman.” In a Canadian postcard from the middle of the century, a dainty gentleman points, limp-wristed, at a police officer and asks, “Is it true you fellows always get your man?” At some point—certainly by the early 20th century, but maybe even earlier—gay men co-opted stereotypical postures and hand gestures as a way to signal their sexual orientation. In a 1919 homosexuality trial in New Hampshire, for example, the judge asked a witness how gay men identified each other. The witness said a gay man “acted sort of peculiar, walking around with his hands on his hips… the expression with the eyes and the gestures.”

In his controversial instructions on how to deal with gay-acting children, Pastor Sean Harris picked up on a recurring theme in popular culture: how to train apparently gay men to assume stereotypically heterosexual mannerisms. In the 1956 film version of the play Tea and Sympathy, for example, a college student tries to teach his roommate how to walk like a heterosexual man. The same scene occurs in the 1996 film, The Birdcage, in which Robin Williams repeatedly strikes Nathan Lane’s hand in an attempt to make him appear more masculine.

Got a question about today’s news? Ask the Explainer.

Explainer thanks Thomas King of Brandeis University, author of The Gendering of Men.

Video Explainer: Why Do Parrots Parrot, and Do They Know What They’re Saying?

This video was produced from an original Explainer by Will Oremus.

Want more questions answered? You can now watch video Explainers at Slate’s News Channel on YouTube.

Help! My Partner Is Giving Away Our Life Savings..

May 17th, 2012 by admin

When I was a financial adviser several years ago cheap replica watches, I had a client named Max — a business executive in his late 50’s who was looking forward to retirement. But Max had two issues that were thwarting his peace of mind. The first was his adult son Alex’s inability to attain financial independence. The second was his wife’s refusal to stop helping their son out. “It’s threatening my retirement plans and my marriage replica watches,” he told me.

Max had a good reason to be frustrated. After a prolonged, expensive film school education, 30-year-old Alex drifted between part time jobs in Los Angeles, balancing a robust surfing schedule with an active nightlife. But to Max, it didn’t appear that Alex’s lifestyle was impeding his ability to make ends meet — until he discovered that his wife was secretly sending Alex a fair sum of money to help with rent and other expenses. Worse yet, the cash was coming from a savings account that Max had earmarked for retirement. He was furious, saying he didn’t know if he was more upset with his son’s irresponsibility or his wife’s deception. Because support like this is becoming increasingly common, so are potential disputes.

So at what age do your children outgrow the need for financial help? It may be older than you think. Recent research indicates that a whopping 93 percent of Americans who are a part of the baby boomer generation have provided some sort of financial help to their grown Gen X or Gen Y children. While many feel good about helping their kids through tough times, couples do not always see eye to eye on how much support is appropriate and under what circumstances.

So what can you do if you and your spouse disagree on if — or how — to help your struggling adult child with their finances?

Discuss the situation together. Talk openly about the reason your child needs financial support and determine if it’s a true need, or the result of immature or irresponsible behavior. If your child is being conscientious but needs some help, decide in principle if you agree that financial help is appropriate. Keep in mind that this conversation may expose a difference in opinion about the definition of a need or irresponsible behavior. If this is the case, work to find a compromise that both you and your spouse are comfortable with.

Work with your spouse to asses any risk to your own financial goals. If your child needs help with one month’s of utility payments or an unexpected car repair, coughing up the cash to help may put a strain on your immediate plans but likely won’t threaten to derail your retirement goals. But if he or she is moving home for an indefinite amount of time or needs help with monthly student loan payments, calculate whether this will delay or affect your retirement. If you ultimately decide to help replica watches, come to an agreement with your spouse about the absolute amount and timeframe so that neither of you will feel like your retirement plans are threatened.

Don’t cheat. Sneaking money to your child after you’ve agreed not to do so is a recipe for marital strife. If you disagree about helping your adult child financially, rather than hiding help from your spouse, negotiate a middle ground.

If you are having trouble talking through the situation or determining how much support you can afford, consider consulting a financial adviser or other professional. Sometimes a neutral third party can help you make an objective assessment of the situation and also help communicate your decisions to your family members.

Analysis China growth risks signal need for fisca

May 17th, 2012 by admin

BEIJING (Reuters) – China may need a back-up plan to stop economic growth being cut short by a surprise dip in demand at home and abroad that suggests monetary policy easing steps taken since the final quarter of last year are insufficient to deal with the downturn.

The People’s Bank of China cut the amount of cash that banks must hold as reserves on Saturday, freeing an estimated 400 billion yuan ($63.5 billion) for lending to add to the roughly 800 billion injected in two previous 50 bps cuts since the government tilted its policy stance towards growth in October.

The move came after data on Friday showed the economy weakening Starter Tattoo Kits, not recovering, from its slowest quarter of growth in three years. Industrial production growth slowed sharply in April and fixed asset investment – a key growth driver – hit its lowest level in nearly a decade, confounding economists expecting signs of a rebound in Q2 data.

“There are risks that policy loosening may under-deliver. If fiscal spending doesn’t speed up quickly, GDP growth faces the risk of going below 8 percent in Q2,” Zhiwei Zhang, chief China economist at Nomura in Hong Kong, told Reuters.

“The critical factor to watch now is fiscal policy. We expect more policy measures on this front will be announced in coming weeks. Premier Wen said on April 13 that “we need to prepare back-up plans in case growth weakens further”. Now that growth has indeed weakened more, it is time for the back-up plans to be rolled out,” Zhang said.

April 13 was when China revealed its weakest three months of growth on an annual basis in nearly three years, at 8.1 percent.

Back then many economists, including Zhang, thought that would mark the bottom of China’s current downswing – especially as new bank lending data for March published the day before had topped 1 trillion yuan in the strongest showing in a year – and triggered widespread raising of bearish 2012 growth forecasts.

Last week’s data, by contrast, saw economists at UBS and Bank of America/Merrill Lynch slash their growth estimates within hours of the numbers being published and call for policy action to achieve growth of around 8 percent, widely regarded as government’s aim, rather than the 7.5 percent official target.

FASTER Top Tattoo Machines, FATTER SPENDING

Faster, fatter spending on infrastructure and social housing, more tax breaks for business and incentives to boost consumer spending are among the typical additional measures called for.

That would be on top of the measures already anticipated – including another 100 bps of required reserve ratio cuts for banks in the second half of the year – to keep growth on track.

“We were wrong and we revise down growth forecasts,” was the straight-to-the-point heading in the message line of an email sent to clients by Ting Lu, China economist at Bank of America/Merrill Lynch in Hong Kong after Friday’s torrent of data drowned his call of a Q2 GDP bounce to 8.5 percent.

He now expects growth of 7.6 percent in Q2 and 8 percent for the year versus 8.6 percent previously. The consensus forecast for 2012 growth in the benchmark Reuters poll before Friday’s data was 8.4 percent.

Lu is struggling to understand why the April data was so far away from market expectations and thinks a new reporting system requiring China’s 700,000 biggest manufacturers, representing 90 percent of the total value added in the factory sector, to submit numbers directly the National Bureau of Statistics in Beijing – rather than local offices – might be the root cause.

Whatever is behind the drop-off, the new consensus view is that Beijing will have to raise its game to stop the rot.

Especially as trade data earlier in the week saw an annual rate of export growth around half the level expected and growth in imports grinding to a halt on a nominal basis in April, underlining China’s vulnerability to weakness in global demand for goods produced in the country’s vast factory sector.

“The April data reconfirmed our view that the first quarter was not the bottom. If anything, the trend seems to be slightly worse than what we had priced into our call for 7.8 percent year-on-year real GDP growth in Q2,” Yao Wei Tattoo Kits Uk, China economist at Societe Generale in Hong Kong told Reuters.

Yao expects action on three fronts – accelerating infrastructure investment, easing property tightening policies and rolling out a package of tariff cuts and consumption incentives.

CREDIT DEMAND KEY

Whatever Beijing’s fiscal response, few expect stimulus spending modeled on the 4 trillion yuan ($635 billion) splurge unveiled in the wake of the 2008-09 global financial crisis, which buoyed growth but triggered spikes in inflation and real estate speculation that the government spent two years correcting.

Meanwhile further easing in monetary policy is likely to have to boost demand for credit, rather than simply making it available. Chinese banks need to lend about 850 billion yuan in both May and June to hit the 2.4 trillion yuan Q2 lending quota the market believes Beijing is working towards.

Monthly loan growth of 800 billion has only been achieved eight times since 2004, five of those occasions while China was rolling out its 4 trillion yuan stimulus program.

That, for many analysts, makes a fiscal response more likely given the government’s deep pockets after a record tax take in 2011 and a modest deficit target of 1.5 percent of GDP – especially as going down that route makes it easier for Beijing to order loans to be extended to hit the credit creation target.

And with a leadership transition looming towards the end of this year, analysts are certain that China’s Communist Party chiefs will do all they can to engineer a soft landing for the economy and as smooth a handover of power as possible.

“A quickened and strengthened policy stimulus is key for stabilizing China’s growth in the coming months. Chances of more aggressive easing have increased,” analysts at HSBC said in a client note.

“The immediate delivery of RRR cut right after the weak April data suggest that Beijing is responding actively. We expect more aggressive delivery of policy stimulus via quantitative easing, substantial tax breaks, fiscal spending and investment deregulation in the coming months to ensure a soft landing.” ($1 = 6.3106 Chinese yuan)

(Editing by Alex Richardson)

China

The Scene-Stealer In The Avengers Is… Cobie Smul

May 17th, 2012 by admin

If you haven’t seen The Avengers yet, what, do you not like America or something?

If you have seen the movie, I’d imagine afterwards you had a discussion face-to-face, on a Facebook status or through tweets regarding who you thought stole the show. Did you like Robert Downey Jr.’s sarcastic quips and even more sarcastic facial hair? Could you not divert your attention away from Chris Evans’ bi’s and tri’s? Did your inner-nerd get excited when Mark Ruffalo was talking scientific jargon about transcendent squares of energy?

Like the thematic all-star game it is, everybody in The Avengers is jockeying for position and gets a little bit of shine. Iron Man and Captain America have fast-talking, Vince Vaughn-esque, back-and-forth banter. Hulk and Thor share a moment in which they single-handedly provided the sold-out show I was in with the biggest guffawing. Black Widow and Hawkeye get existential. Nick Fury… has a tight eyepatch.

But for me, the sole stealer of scenes in The Avengers was Cobie Smulders.

Cobie Smulders? Yes Tattoo Gun Buy, Cobie Smulders.

The actress, best known for playing Robin Scherbatsky on CBS’s sitcom How I Met Your Mother, popped-up playing S.H.I.E.L.D. Agent Maria Hill. When she first appears in the first few scenes of the movie Tattoo Stencil Machine, I squinted my eyes hard in confusion. This wasn’t a character that I had previously seen in the post-credit clips of the previous Marvel movies. WTF?

It took a while to register, but it finally came to me; “Oh my God… that’s Robin Sparkles.”

For the next two hours and 20 minutes, whenever Smulders appeared, I quietly freaked out. An actress best known for being a real Canadian hoser and former teen pop star was now backing-up Samuel L. Jackson and the whole Avengers crew. Now, I’m completely ignorant to the Marvel universe, but upon some research, it seems Maria Hill is a pretty important character — so important that Smulders is inked to appear in seven more films in the franchise. Every scene she’s in, there’s an odd, and possibly calculated prominence given to her, perhaps setting the table for the sequel. Her character doesn’t have a really defined or important function (yet), but she’s illogically effective. Amid recognizable superheroes being played by Oscar nominees and sex symbols, she is able to hold her own without doing a whole lot.

Smulders, unlike most of her How I Met Your Mother co-stars, hasn’t had the opportunity to translate her small screen work to the big one. Her biggest film role to date prior to The Avengers was starring in the little-seen Broken Lizard movie, The Slammin’ Salmon. In just a few years, she has gone from playing a waitress competing for Norah Jones tickets to playing a pivotal role in the one of the biggest flicks of all-time. While I don’t think it’s the best superhero movie of all-time (big ups to The Dark Knight), The Avengers will be forever immortalized — from the record-breaking box office numbers, to the universal love from critics, to the inevitable spot on FX every other weekend for the rest of time. In less than a week of release, it’s already an instant classic. It’s hella zeitgeist.

Writer, director, king of fanboys and brainchild behind The Avengers, Joss Whedon, already has a well-established relationship with cast members of How I Met Your Mother. Alyson Hannigan was in his long-running show Buffy The Vampire Slayer and Neil Patrick Harris collaborated with him on the Emmy-award winning and cult hit Dr. Horrible’s Sing-A-Long Blog. It’s not surprising that this adorable nepotism possibly lead to Smulders being cast in The Avengers; what is surprising is the history they already had with each other.

In 2006, Whedon was hired to write and direct a now-defunct adaptation of Wonder Woman for the big screen. Whedon’s choice for the iconic super heroine; Smulders. It makes sense. She’s a beautiful brunette who kind of looks likes Lynda Carter and would be convincing thwarting evil in the role. Fans have even made concept art of Smulders as Wonder Woman.

More recently, MMA star and Haywire actress Gina Carano has expressed interest in donning the patriotic duds and Drive director Nicolas Winding Refn wants Mad Men’s Christina Hendricks for the role in his interpretation.

No.

Based on my near spiritual experience with Smulders in The Avengers, if she and Whedon are not solely committed to this franchise for the next two decades, I say they dust off that Wonder Woman script and supply super heroine addicts with their rightful fix. As a dual-threat in rival comic universes, she could dethrone Milla Jovovich as the most consistently badass actress in Hollywood.

If you Tattoo Guns Kits, like me, were captivated by Smulders in The Avengers, imagine what she could do with a lasso of truth.

It is Time to Reject Rule by and for the Millionai

May 16th, 2012 by admin

We now know from this week’s Sunday Times Rich List that the billionaires are getting richer by the day whilst the rest of the country faces austerity and lengthening dole queues for the young. Shockingly, the richest 1000 gained an extra £155 billion in the last three years alone.

We also know Boris Johnson’s response to the current situation. He is the Tory Mayor of one of the most divided cities in Europe where extravagant wealth cohabits alongside great poverty. Stark figures reveal that the poorest 50% of Londoners have less than 5% of financial or property wealth. The richest 10% now have 65% of financial wealth and over 45% of property wealth.

But Boris sees nothing wrong with this. Not content with Osborne’s tax handout which gave an extra £5000 per week to anyone on a salary of £5 million and took money away from pensioners and working families Buy Chanel Dresses, he now wants to see further tax cuts for the millionaires.

Some people might want to continue to regard ‘Boris’ as a mere buffoon – harmless, affable and entertaining. He is far more dangerous than that. He emerged out of the very core of the 1%, and is located at the centre of the most dangerous group within an already dangerous Conservative Party.

If the Tories regain the mayoralty on Thursday, they will feel emboldened to continue on their divisive course. In particular, because Mayor Johnson plays a particular role as a cheerleader for the Conservative Right, his wing on the Tories will feel strengthened.

A Boris Johnson victory would embolden Osborne and unleash a further dynamic within the Tory party to tighten the austerity.

These are the stakes which are in play in the mayoral election.

For those who find this argument exaggerated or hard to believe, we should recall that he was amongst the first to advocate a tax payback to the richest in our country.

It was Boris Johnson who took up the cause for a reduction in the 50% tax rate almost as soon as Labour announced the higher rate. Long before Osborne took the decision to cut the top rate of tax and put huge sums of money back into the pockets of the top 1%, Mayor Johnson was calling for double the tax giveaway for the very richest, supporting a cut to just 40%.

Now we see once again Boris acting as a right wing outrider for the 1% with his suggestion of further tax reductions in this week’s Sunday Telegraph, aimed not a helping the millions of Londoners bearing the brunt of his Party’s austerity drive, but at benefiting the vested interests in the City.

Under the Coalition led by Boris’s Tory colleagues, the UK has slipped back into a disastrous and avoidable recession. Millions of Londoners are facing huge pressure on their family budgets thanks to the complete failure of Tory policies – endorsed and promoted by Johnson – to protect the interests of the public and deliver jobs and growth.

Boris’s now infamous “chicken feed” comments – referring to the £250,000 per year income he receives for a second job writing for the Telegraph on top of his Mayoral responsibilities – confirm just how obscenely out of touch he really is.

While he rakes in this “chicken feed” Cheap DKNY Clothes, more than 400,000 London pensioners have lost money through the Tory ‘granny tax’ to pay for a tax cut for the super rich. And almost 120,000 London families face losing all of their tax credits because of the Tory tax credit cuts.

It is irresponsible of many in the commentariat to ignore these issues and to pretend that the mayoral election is only a battle between two personalities with no real national consequence for the wider society. Do not believe this even for a second.

We can’t let the Tories get away with it. A second term for a Tory Mayor will have consequences for us all. On Friday Mr Clegg encountered mothers who are going without meals in order to feed their children. He said you would have to have a cold heart not to be affected as if their plight had nothing to do with the government of which he is the deputy prime minister.

But the voters must not think, like Clegg, that they can wash their hands of responsibility for their actions on Thursday if they fail to vote against the Tories. Let every elector in London understand that their actions on Thursday can either accelerate the austerity or contribute to the resistance.

It is time to resist.

Libs betraying business over tax cutsPM

May 15th, 2012 by admin

Prime Minister Julia Gillard has accused Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of political heresy for vowing to vote against the government's proposed tax cuts for business.

But Mr Abbott says Labor's plan Tattoo Supplies, which is tied to a mining tax, is a con and the coalition will offer “real” cuts if it wins government.

As the battle for the high ground with business continued on Wednesday, Treasurer Wayne Swan released draft laws to reduce the company tax rate, from 30 per cent to 29 per cent, to be introduced to parliament in early May.

The bill, expected to pass the Senate this week or early next, is linked to the 30 per cent Minerals Resource Rent Tax (MRRT) on coal and iron ore profits.

Under the legislation, small business will get tax cuts from July 1, while bigger companies will have to wait until 2013/14.

“This will help up to 720,000 small business companies by allowing them to reinvest more of their profits to grow their businesses and employ more Australians,” Mr Swan said in a statement.

But Mr Abbott reiterated the coalition won't be supporting the government's MRRT or the measures associated with it, including the corporate tax cuts.

Ms Gillard told parliament Mr Abbott's stance was a “betrayal” to business and “heresy to what the Liberal Party has always believed in”.

Mr Abbott said the coalition would deliver its own “modest” business tax cut, if elected to government.

However, he wouldn't say if the cut would be in line with its 2010 election promise of a 1.5 per cent reduction.

“What you will get from us are tax cuts without new taxes,” he told reporters in Canberra.

“What you get from Labor is … a tax cut funded from a tax increase. It is not a real tax cut, it is a con.”

Ms Gillard questioned how the coalition would pay for its tax cut, if it was not going to back the mining tax.

But the future of Labor's tax cuts for big business appears to have hit a roadblock after the Australian Greens said they would only support the cut for small businesses.

“Why would we be giving back to the corporate sector $2.4 billion Tattoo Supplies, particularly to very big players in the mining boom who have managed to escape a super profits tax which ought to be bringing $100 billion extra into taxpayer revenues?” Greens Leader Bob Brown said.

Asked whether the government was prepared to split or amend the bill – so at least the small-business tax cuts go through – Finance Minister Penny Wong said she was sure there would be a lot of “procedural issues” to manage in the weeks ahead.

The Business Council of Australia, which represents the nation's top 100 company bosses, said the political debate highlighted the pitfalls of developing “tax policy on the run”.

“If the parliament gets bogged down in political brinkmanship over which, if any, businesses need a more competitive tax environment, or refusing to support an economy-wide reduction in the company tax rate, they will not be serving the nation well,” the council's chief executive Jennifer Westacott said in a statement.

The Australian Industry Group is urging the Greens to reconsider their position.

Chief executive Heather Ridout said the Henry Tax Review recommended corporate tax be cut to 25 per cent, to ease the burden for companies on the wrong side of the mining boom.

“Twenty nine per cent is the bare minimum required, but a start,” she said in a statement.

“And as envisaged by Henry, the cut should be available to companies of all sizes.”

The mining tax on coal and iron ore from July 1 will also help fund an increase in superannuation contributions.

The MRRT legislation is currently in the Senate and must be dealt with by 9.15pm (AEDT) on Monday.

FallguyologyA User’s Guide

May 14th, 2012 by admin

In Washington Herve Leger sale, it’s raining fall guys. During President Bush’s first term, you couldn’t dislodge a political appointee to save your life. I learned this the hard way, predicting imminent demise for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld five years before his departure, for Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill one year before his departure Herve Leger sale, and for White House factotum Karl Rove, who never left. That was when Bush was riding high in the polls. With Bush’s approval rating now stuck in the 30-percent-to-40-percent range, he’s a little more attentive to criticism. The replacement of the sycophantic White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card with the smarter and tougher-minded Josh Bolton is likely another reason so many bodies are being thrown overboard.

Who are the fall guys? The most famous right now is Scooter Libby, former chief of staff to Vice President Dick Cheney. Libby is shouldering full blame for Plamegate, even though Rove Buy Karen Millen Dresses, former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, and possibly former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer were just as guilty of the underlying offense of outing a CIA employee. (While probably legal, their actions should have gotten Rove and Armitage fired; Fleischer was on his way out the door anyway.) Army Gen. George Weightman, who appears to have had little to do with creating the outpatient scandal at Walter Reed Army Hospital, nonetheless was the first to go when news of the scandal hit the Washington Post. He was followed by the seemingly more-culpable Army Secretary Francis Harvey and Army Surgeon General Kevin C. Kiley. Meanwhile DKNY Dresses sale, the bubbling scandal surrounding the ham-handed and politically motivated firings of eight U.S. attorneys led to the March 13 resignation of D. Kyle Sampson, chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, for allegedly failing to inform higher-ups about his contacts with the White House about the firings. That same day, the Bush administration released e-mails  identifying former White House Counsel Harriet Miers (who resigned two months earlier) as the person who first proposed wholesale firings of U.S. attorneys. This is Miers’ second tour as fall guy (fall person?), the first being her humiliating withdrawal as nominee to the Supreme Court in 2005 after Bush was criticized for promoting an unqualified crony. Bush “reluctantly” accepted Miers’ withdrawal. It’s widely expected that Bush, with equal reluctance, will accept Gonzales’ resignation.

Advertisement

The fall guy represents a particular social type in Washington, and Gonzales fits it to a T. The ideal fall guy is fervently loyal and not particularly bright. Loyalty is required because a good fall guy must accept blame or at least not assign it to higher-ups (in this instance, President Bush, who admits that he passed on complaints about U.S. attorneys from congressional Republicans but insists that he “never brought up a specific case nor gave him specific instructions”). Dimness is helpful because the more plausibly incompetent a fall guy is, the more willingly the press and the public will believe that the scandal is his fault. Federal Emergency Management Agency administrator Michael “Heck of a Job” Brown, for instance Buy DKNY Clothes, was so clearly in over his head during Hurricane Katrina that his departure took the heat off Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, who was found subsequently to bear much of the blame. (Brown wasn’t particularly loyal to Chertoff after his dismissal, but by then his public image was so buffoonish that it scarcely mattered.)

If a loyal and dim fall guy is unavailable, a loyal and conspicuously zealous fall guy is second-best. Hence Libby (whose chief task as fall guy is Cheap Herve leger strapless, and probable motive in lying to prosecutors was, to protect zealot-in-chief Cheney). Two Libby antecedents were President Richard Nixon’s domestic advisor John Ehrlichman and Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, whose resignations Nixon accepted reluctantly (“two of the finest public servants it has been my privilege to know”) in April 1973. Nixon tended to confess to wrongdoing through pre-emptive denial (most famously: “I am not a crook”), and he demonstrated this tic when he announced these two resignations. “I will not place the blame on subordinates—on people whose zeal exceeded their judgment and who may have done wrong in a cause they deeply believed to be right,” Nixon declaimed. But that’s precisely what Nixon was doing, in hopes that he could put the Watergate scandal behind him. The strategy failed but not through lack of steadfastness by the shrewd and loyal Ehrlichman and Haldeman. It was White House Counsel John Dean, whom Nixon fired around the same time, who foiled the coverup. Dean was a spectacularly poor choice for fall guy because he came clean to investigators and demonstrated, in the process, a crisply precise memory of the Watergate coverup. Another unwisely designated fall guy was Donald Regan, chief of staff to President Ronald Reagan when the Iran-contra scandal broke. Regan, a clever and vindictive man with no great love for his boss, was pushed out at the height of the scandal, even though he would never be implicated in it. Regan hit back by revealing, in a White House memoir published near the end of Reagan’s second term, that First Lady Nancy Reagan—who reportedly had ordered his firing—had required him to rearrange President Reagan’s schedule according to the dictates of an astrologer named Joan Quigley.

How well do you remember the fall guys of recent American history? In our next installment, a quiz.

Mitsubishi releases updated JDM Outlander Roadest

May 14th, 2012 by admin

2010 Mitsubishi Outlander Roadest – click for high-res gallery
Cheap Chanel Dresses
Normally when an automaker updates a model Herve Leger v neck sale, even if it’s just a quick cosmetic change, the earlier version is treated like cheek meat – nobody wants it unless it’s a real good deal, and the dealers just want them gone. Mitsubishi evidently thinks its home-market will be kinder to the compact crossover-ute-thing we know and love as the Outlander.

While a new Evo-esque beak has been grafted onto our Outlander for 2010, the softer, older version will continue to be offered to JDM buyers alongside a more cosmetically aggressive model. To avoid confusion, a country-specific rhinoplasty-enhanced model will be branded Outlander Roadest (note that the fascia and Discount Christian Audigier Clothes, grille and foglamps are all distinct from the U.S. model), while the older bodywork model will continue on as just plain “Outlander.” Regardless of the looks Discount Christian Audigier Clothing, both iterations will get a new 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine as standard, good for 148PS (about 146 horsepower). The offal-likeness is in play with pricing as well, with the new-old Outlander selling for just ¥1,995 Discount Chloe Dresses,000 (about $22,000) while the Roadest will command ¥2,475 Replica Bandage dresses,900 ($27,100).

Related GalleryMitsubishi Roadest
[Source: Mitsubishi]

To Hell With the Archbishop of Canterbury

May 14th, 2012 by admin

The archbishop of Canterbury with the Rev. David Coffey

In December 1931, George Orwell got himself arrested in the slums of East London in order to find out about conditions “inside,” and then he wrote an essay about the people he met while in detention. One of them was a buyer for a kosher butcher who had embezzled some of his boss’s money. To Orwell’s surprise, the man told him that “his employer would probably get into trouble at the synagogue for prosecuting him. It appears that the Jews have arbitration courts of their own, and a Jew is not supposed to prosecute another Jew, at least in a breach-of-trust case like this, without first submitting it to the arbitration court.”

You might think that such relics of the medieval ghetto, and of the rabbinical control that was part of ghetto life, had more or less disappeared in England in the 21st century. And you would largely be right. There exists a “Beth Din Replica Herve Leger gown,” or religious court Discount Herve Leger v neck, in the prosperous North London suburb of Finchley to which the ultra-Orthodox submit some of their more arcane disputes. (This little world is very amusingly described by Naomi Alderman in her lovely novel Disobedience.) But to speak in general, Jews in Britain consider themselves, and are considered, to be answerable to the same laws as everybody else. Should I mention any of the numerous reasons why it would be extremely nerve-racking if this were not true?

Advertisement

But now the archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, has cited the Beth Dinas one of his reasons for believing that sharia, or Islamic law, can and should become a part of what he called “plural jurisdiction” in Britain. His reasoning, if one may call it that, is clear: Other faiths already have their own legal authorities, so why not the Muslims, too? What could be more tolerant and diverse? This same argument has been used already, and will be used again, to demand that laws governing “blasphemy,” originally written to protect only Christians from being upset, should now, in a nondiscriminatory way, be amended to cover Muslims as well. The alternative—don’t have any blasphemy laws and let religious people’s feelings be hurt Buy Chanel Dresses, just as the feelings of the secular are regularly offended by religion—doesn’t occur to the archbishop and people who think like him.

A BBC interview with Williams had him saying that the opening to sharia would “help maintain social cohesion.” If that phrase is even intended to mean anything, it can only imply that a concession of this kind would lessen the propensity to violence among Muslims. But such abjectness is not the only definition of social cohesion that we have. By a nice coincidence, a London think tank called the Center for Social Cohesion issued a report just days before the leader of the world’s Anglicans and Episcopalians capitulated to Islamic demands. Titled “Crimes of the Community: Honour-Based Violence in the UK Replica DKNY Dresses,” and written by James Brandon and Salam Hafez, it set out a shocking account of the rapid spread of theocratic crime. The main headings were murder and beating of women, genital mutilation, forced marriage, and vigilante methods employed against those who complained. It could well be—since we are becoming every day more familiar with the first three—that the fourth is the one that should concern us most.

Picture the life of a young Urdu-speaking woman brought to Yorkshire from Pakistan to marry a man—quite possibly a close cousin—whom she has never met. He takes her dowry Buy Marc Jacobs Dresses, beats her, and abuses the children he forces her to bear. She is not allowed to leave the house unless in the company of a male relative and unless she is submissively covered from head to toe. Suppose that she is able to contact one of the few support groups that now exist for the many women in Britain who share her plight. What she ought to be able to say is, “I need the police, and I need the law to be enforced.” But what she will often be told is, “Your problem is better handled within the community.” And those words, almost a death sentence, have now been endorsed and underwritten—and even advocated—by the country’s official spiritual authority.

You might argue that I am describing an extreme case (though, alas, now not an uncommon one), but it is the principle of equality before the law that really counts. And just look at how casually this sheep-faced English cleric throws away the work of centuries of civilization:

[A]n approach to law which simply said “there’s one law for everybody and that’s all there is to be said, and anything else that commands your loyalty or allegiance is completely irrelevant in the processes of the courts”—I think that’s a bit of a danger.

In the midst of this dismal verbiage and euphemism, the plain statement—”There’s one law for everybody and that’s all there is to be said”—still stands out like a diamond in a dunghill. It stands out precisely because it is said simply, and because its essential grandeur is intelligible to everybody. Its principles ought to be just as intelligible and accessible to those who don’t yet speak English Discount Herve Leger v neck, in just the same way as the great Lord Mansfield once ruled that, wherever someone might have been born, and whatever he had been through, he could not be subject to slavery once he had set foot on English soil. Simple enough?  For the women who are the principal prey of the shariasystem, it is often only when they are shipped or flown to Britain that their true miseries begin. This modern disgrace is deepened and extended by a fatuous cleric who, presiding over an increasingly emaciated and schismatic and irrelevant church, nonetheless maintains that any faith is better than none at all.

Four Dollars a Gallon and Rising

May 13th, 2012 by admin

An Exxon gas station in Washington, D.C., on April 20

Speaker of the House John Boehner made a prediction Monday about Barack Obama’s re-election bid. “If gas prices are $5 or $6 Replica Jaeger LeCoultre Watches, he certainly isn’t going to win,”said Boehner in an interview on ABC News.

It might be the least disputable thing a politician has ever said. Well, yes: If people have to keep paying more and more to fill their cars up, the president could lose re-election—even to one of the current batch of Republicans. There’s evidence, circumstantial but graphically compelling, that the president’s current poll numbers are a function of the price of gas.

Advertisement

So: What can the president do about it? The standard answer is, “Not much.” The political answer is, “Glom on to a policy that my party and/or industry wants him to support.” The actual answer is somewhere between these two. There is no shortage of ideas. The issue will be which party or politician is skillful enough at using the politics of the moment—and oil companies will report their new, sure-to-be-massive profits over the coming days—to put any of these ideas into practice.

Here’s the bad news. In times of great panic over gas prices, Republicans and Democrats—and, more subtly, paid-for experts—resurrect some of their favorite energy plans. Democrats want to end tax subsidies for oil companies, and they’ve gotten a lift from Boehner’s ad hoc agreement with them in that ABC News interview. Republicans—again, led by Boehner—say that Obama isn’t taking “all of the above” energy plans seriously. (“All of the above” is a way to mention unpopular energy policies without actually mentioning them.)

“I think the fact that he won’t allow exploration in the Gulf, doesn’t allow exploration in the inter-mountain west How to buy Replica Ulysse Nardin Watches, won’t allow us to drill in Alaska Replica Girard Perregaux Watches, this is not helping the situation,” said Boehner. “And then when you look at what the EPA is doing in terms of the number of rules and regulations comin’ down the pike, those were his responsibility.”

It would be awfully convenient if new drilling licenses in the Gulf and relaxed EPA regulations could drive the price of oil down. They wouldn’t.

“If someone tries to dupe you into thinking we don’t have enough refining capacity, that’s bullshit Cartier Replica Watches,” says Tom Kloza, the co-founder and chief oil analyst of the Oil Price Information Service. “It’s a good soundbite, but if anything, companies have probably added too much capacity, and if they add more they have to focus on managing margins.”

It’s a good enough soundbite that a lot of Republicans use it to argue that the White House’s dithering on Gulf Coast drilling, in the wake of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster, is responsible for rising prices. Oil companies, in this telling Replica Hublot Watches for Cheap, are stuck in a sort of “permitorium.” But the Deepwater disaster didn’t have much of an effect on prices. When the rig blew on April 20, 2010 Fake Ulysse Nardin Watches, crude was trading around $84 per barrel. When the well was capped on July 15 the price had fallen to $76.

A barrel of brent crude oil costs roughly $50 more today than it did back then. We have some idea why. The critical factor has been the unrest in the Middle East. According to industry analysts, prices have gone up because of worries both about what’s already happening and what could happen. The civil war in Libya, a country that usually produces 1.6 million barrels of light, sweet crude every day, has added something like $20 to the price of a barrel of oil—a combination of decreased availability and speculative panic. Worries about what could happen in other OPEC nations are driving the price even higher.

SINGLE PAGE Page: 1 | 2